Three of Steam’s top ten bestsellers right now have zero reviews between them. Zero players, too, in one case. None of them are games in any meaningful sense — two are bulk-purchase bundles and one is a storefront for virtual coins.

The chart, as of May 2, 2026, tells the story. At #4 sits the やぶから堂オススメパック, a SGD 150.51 bundle from Japanese adult publisher Yabukaradou. At #7, the Victoria 3: Ultimate Bundle — packing the base game and nearly all of Paradox Interactive’s DLC, discounted 43% to SGD 81.37 from SGD 191.00. And at #10, EA SPORTS FC 26 - FC Points, a $0.99 in-game currency pack with exactly zero concurrent players on its own store page.

A currency pack nobody is playing outranks the vast majority of Steam’s roughly 19,000 titles released in 2025 alone.

This is how Steam’s revenue ranking actually works. According to Valve’s own Steamworks documentation, the top sellers list aggregates “all revenue sources” — microtransactions, DLC, and base game purchases, all treated equally — over a trailing 24-hour window, with extra weight given to the most recent three hours of spending.

Valve explicitly states the chart is not curated and not designed to favor any particular business model. The result is honest in the narrowest sense: these items genuinely generate more revenue than most games on the platform. GameDiscoverCo estimates that DLC and microtransactions account for approximately 27% of all Steam revenue as of early 2026.

But “top seller” on Steam doesn’t mean most-played, most-discussed, or most-recommended. It means most-spent-on. A $150 bundle with zero reviews and a dollar-store currency pack both pass through the same revenue-weighted funnel as titles with millions of concurrent players. The chart isn’t lying about what’s selling. It’s just not telling you what people are playing — and on Steam, that distinction is increasingly the entire story.

Sources