Six hundred seventeen thousand reviews. Eighty-six percent positive. A Metacritic score of 69.

Something doesn’t add up — unless you’ve played Rust.

Facepunch Studios’ survival game sits at #7 on Steam’s top sellers right now, full price, no discount, no seasonal sale propping it up. $39.99. Sixty-eight thousand six hundred concurrent players at time of writing, with a 24-hour peak of 141,051 according to SteamCharts. These are numbers most new releases would beg for. Rust launched in 2018.

The Metacritic gap tells you what critics couldn’t measure. A 69 aggregate suggests a game that’s fine — competent, unremarkable, rough around the edges. Meanwhile, 532,611 Steam users dropped a thumbs-up.

Rust doesn’t score on polish. It scores on compulsion.

The player data backs that up. SteamCharts shows Rust climbing from roughly 9,000 average players in late 2013 to consistent six-figure averages throughout 2025 and 2026. The all-time peak of 259,646 hit in January 2025. Player counts surge every January like a ritual — a survival game that became a seasonal event.

Facepunch keeps showing up, too. The naval update, delayed from the 2025 holidays after COO Alistair McFarlane admitted the studio “took on too much,” shipped February 5, 2026 and pushed that month’s average to 122,377 players. The April 2026 patch refined ship combat with cannon-induced movement penalties, deep-sea loot respawn systems, and performance work that cut mission validation cost from ~20ms to ~1.5ms.

Critics measured Rust at launch and found it rough. Players measured it in thousands of hours. The only score that stuck was playtime.

Sources