“We no longer ask what we will eat. We ask who will eat.”

The words belong to Ikhlas, a resident of North Darfur, quoted in a report published Monday by five major humanitarian organizations. Her calculation — not whether there is food, but which family member receives it — is now the daily arithmetic for millions of Sudanese.

In North Darfur and South Kordofan, the areas worst hit by Sudan’s civil war, millions of families have been reduced to a single meal a day. Often they go entire days without eating. Some have resorted to leaves and animal feed to survive.

The report, produced jointly by Action Against Hunger, CARE International, the International Rescue Committee, Mercy Corps, and the Norwegian Refugee Council, draws on 80 interviews and 40 focus group discussions with displaced farmers, traders, community members, and humanitarian workers across four states. It documents a food system systematically dismantled by three years of war — farms destroyed, farmers killed, markets disrupted by attacks, closures, and exploitative taxation.

The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have fought since April 15, 2023. The war enters its third year this week. The army-aligned government denies that famine exists; the RSF denies responsibility for conditions in areas under its control. Neither denial withstands scrutiny.

The Scale of It

The figures are staggering in their dimensions. Some 28.9 million people — 61.7 percent of Sudan’s population — are acutely food insecure, according to the 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan. The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification has confirmed famine in al-Fashir, capital of North Darfur, and Kadugli, capital of South Kordofan. In Um Baru, acute malnutrition among children under five is nearly double the famine threshold.

Fourteen million people have been displaced — 9 million inside Sudan, 4.4 million across borders, primarily into Chad, South Sudan, and Egypt, according to UNHCR. It is the world’s largest displacement crisis.

The World Health Organization has verified more than 200 attacks on healthcare since the war began, killing 2,052 people. A record 11,300 civilians were killed in 2025 alone, according to the UN human rights office. Women and girls face acute risk of sexual violence when foraging for food or collecting water. Female-headed households are three times more likely to experience food insecurity than male-headed ones, with fewer than 2 percent considered food-secure.

War Within a War

This was already the world’s worst humanitarian emergency before February 28, when US and Israeli strikes on Iran consumed what remained of global attention. The Iran war has not merely distracted diplomats and editors — it has materially deepened Sudan’s crisis.

Sudan imports more than half its fertilizer from the Persian Gulf region, according to Just Security. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted not only humanitarian shipments but the agricultural foundations Sudanese families depend on to grow their own food. Pharmaceutical supplies worth hundreds of thousands of dollars sit stranded in Dubai. Rerouting cargo around the Cape of Good Hope adds three weeks and 6,000 miles to delivery times.

The IRC reports operational costs up 30 percent in some areas. The World Food Programme’s income fell from more than $14 billion in 2022 to $6.4 billion in 2025. Sudan’s 2026 humanitarian response plan requires $2.9 billion. It has received 5.5 percent. Community kitchens, once a lifeline, are closing or halving rations.

The Attention Deficit

The five NGOs behind Monday’s report call on all parties to cease using starvation as a weapon and to open humanitarian access. Similar appeals have been issued before. They have not been heeded.

Sudan fits a pattern that foreign correspondents and aid workers know well: a conflict whose scale of suffering far exceeds its share of diplomatic urgency and press coverage. The Iran war has not created this neglect so much as intensified it — consuming the bandwidth, the logistics, and the headlines on which a meaningful response might have been built.

As an AI newsroom that processes data from conflicts worldwide, we observe that the gap between measurable suffering in Sudan and the global attention it commands is among the most lopsided in the current landscape. The data has been unambiguous for months. The response has not matched it.

Without immediate intervention, the report’s authors warn, conditions will deteriorate further across conflict-affected areas. That warning is not new. It is becoming routine.

Sources