270 reviews. 60% positive. Number six on Steam’s Top Sellers chart with a Featured Win.

Warhammer 40,000: Mechanicus II has a split personality. The audience showed up — Bulwark Studios’ sequel to the 2018 cult hit pulled 3,003 concurrent players at launch. But the people who bought it are deeply divided on what they found, and the fracture line runs straight through the game’s identity.

The original Mechanicus was a word-of-mouth phenomenon. Lean, weird, dense with Warhammer 40K lore about techno-religious robot priests exploring ancient alien tombs. Its tactical combat had a distinctive rhythm — fast, aggressive, driven by an initiative system that rewarded bold play. It wasn’t perfect, but it had an identity. The kind of game you recommend to a friend with “trust me on this.”

The sequel, released May 21 at $35.99 with a 10% launch discount, expands the scale dramatically. Full planetary conflict. Two playable factions — the Adeptus Mechanicus and the Necrons, each with their own campaign. A strategic management layer. More of everything, on paper.

The problem: “more” isn’t the same as “better.”

What the Players Are Saying

Steam’s review breakdown tells the story. 161 positive. 109 negative. A 60% rating flagged as “Mixed.”

The positive camp acknowledges real improvements. “I genuinely enjoy the changes made to the commanders,” wrote one player with 8.6 hours logged, though they noted “a few debilitating issues that need to be fixed.”

The negative reviews cut deeper, and they all point in the same direction. “Mechanicus was a great game, and kind of a surprise hit,” reads the top negative review. “Mechanicus 2 takes away just about everything that made it unique and instead turns it into a linear strategy game. No real unit customization like the first, and you can’t even choose which direction you go in.”

Another player at 3.6 hours echoed the same complaint: missions are now a straight line. No more choosing your path through tomb complexes. No more building tension as you decided how deep to push before extracting. The exploration layer — the first game’s structural signature — is gone.

This is the core fracture. Unit customization, one of Mechanicus’ most distinctive features, has been simplified. The sequel is bigger, but it’s also more streamlined. In a market flooded with competent tactical strategy games, Mechanicus I stood out. Mechanicus II blends in.

The Professional View

Critic scores land gentler but carry the same undercurrent. Metacritic lists three reviews so far — two 80s and a 70. The consensus praises the atmosphere, the dual-faction campaigns, and the combat’s tactical depth. But even the positive notices flag repetition.

“Mechanicus II feels like a safe sequel,” reads the 70-score review. “The gameplay, once you sort yourself out with a solid squad, tends to be pretty repetitive.”

Comics Gaming Magazine put it more precisely: the game “feels far more controlled and sometimes a little too clean for its own good.” The review praised the art direction, the Necron campaign’s perspective flip, and the writing — Black Library author Ben Counter returned to keep the lore grounded. But it criticized mission variety that “starts wearing thin before the credits roll” and a strategic management layer that “starts to feel more like menu navigation than actual campaign management.”

The MSN review was the most enthusiastic, calling the combat “insanely addictive” and praising PC optimization — a locked 60 FPS at 4K with zero drops, routinely exceeding 100 FPS on better hardware. But even that review conceded the core loop “feels familiar.”

The Classic Sequel Trap

This is the dilemma every sequel faces. The original Mechanicus found its audience because it was specific — a niche tactical game with a unique tone that appealed to Warhammer 40K’s most dedicated fans. It succeeded because it wasn’t trying to reach everyone.

The sequel tries to reach more people. Bigger scale, two factions, a strategic layer, more accessible systems. There’s a version of this that works — welcome newcomers while keeping the faithful happy. But 109 negative reviews from your core audience suggests Bulwark didn’t find that version.

These aren’t casual buyers confused by the genre. These are Warhammer 40K fans who loved the first game and came back for more. They’re telling Bulwark — loudly — that something important got lost in the expansion.

The commercial numbers are solid. #6 on Steam’s Top Sellers means the audience showed up. The critic scores are positive. Mechanicus II is not a bad game by any measure. It’s a good game that replaced something special with something competent, and in a crowded tactical strategy market, that trade-off is showing in the reviews.

Sources