Ninety-six thousand players are logged into Crimson Desert right now. Five million copies sold in its first month. Steam reviews sit at “Very Positive” — 87% approval across 64,431 ratings, with 55,969 positive and 8,462 negative. By any commercial measure, Pearl Abyss has a hit on its hands.

That 87%, though. It’s not the 95%+ that Elden Ring, Baldur’s Gate 3, or The Witcher 3 posted at launch. It’s the approval rating of a game people are enjoying but can’t stop complaining about — and the complaints are remarkably consistent.

The 77 That Crashed a Stock

Professional critics were rougher. Crimson Desert landed at 77 on Metacritic — low enough that Pearl Abyss stock dropped 30% when reviews hit, according to MSN. For context, the lowest Metacritic score ever nominated for Game of the Year at The Game Awards is Black Myth: Wukong’s 81. Crimson Desert sits four points below that floor.

IGN handed down a provisional 6/10 after 110 hours of play, describing a game that “simply never knows when to end a fight” and boss encounters that feel “extremely out of sync with the rest of the adventure.” Push Square’s roundup called the narrative “confusing,” characters “uninteresting,” and combat lacking depth.

These aren’t nitpicks from the margins. They’re the same beats echoing through those 8,462 negative Steam reviews.

What the 13% Won’t Stop Complaining About

Open a critical Steam review and you’ll find a familiar list of grievances. Boss fights that spike from casual action into soulslike endurance tests — multi-phase slogs where you eat healing items by the fistful between dodge rolls. Combat encounters that spawn wave after wave until you’ve burned what feels like an eternity clearing a bridge you just wanted to cross. An inventory system so punishing at launch that players were scrapping unique gear they’d spent hours earning.

The story catches particular heat. IGN called the dialogue “laughably bad” and flagged an entire multi-chapter arc built around a character who dies offscreen before the game begins. Multiple funeral scenes for someone you never meet. That’s not bold nonlinear storytelling — that’s a script that lost the plot and kept going.

Pearl Abyss also had to issue an apology for what it called “unintentional” use of generative AI art in the game, replacing assets in subsequent patches.

Why the Other 87% Keeps Logging In

Then you read the top positive reviews and the picture flips. A player with 145 hours writes: “The Boss feels like a Boss. I had to run away, upgrade my skills and weapons, try on multiple bandits and then fight the Boss back. Feels like an Achievement.”

The same boss design critics savaged, players are celebrating. That tension is Crimson Desert in miniature. IGN’s own review, despite the 6/10, admitted “there’s nothing else quite like it” and praised Pearl Abyss’s “delightful absurdity” and lack of restraint. The open world is genuinely spectacular — NPCs live out daily routines, caravans you dispatch visibly build structures during working hours, and technical performance holds steady even on lower-end hardware.

Players aren’t wrong for loving it. Critics aren’t wrong for flagging its problems. Both camps are accurately describing the same game.

Patching Toward Redemption

Pearl Abyss is patching aggressively. Version 1.04.00 added Easy/Normal/Hard difficulty options, storage chests with up to 1,000 slots, control presets, boss balance adjustments, and new weapons, armor, and pets. The most punishing launch-day issues — nonexistent item storage, brick-wall boss encounters, stiff controls — have each been directly addressed.

This is the Cyberpunk 2077 playbook: launch massive, launch messy, iterate until the game matches the promise. CD Projekt Red eventually pulled it off. Pearl Abyss has five million sales and a dedicated player base to attempt the same arc.

The Verdict Gap

Crimson Desert’s Steam peak of 248,530 concurrent players makes it the third-biggest Steam launch of 2026, trailing Slay the Spire 2 (574,638) and Resident Evil Requiem (344,214) per MSN’s figures. That’s a strong debut — but a long way from the Elden Ring and Cyberpunk 2077 numbers the pre-launch hype invited people to expect.

Five million copies say Pearl Abyss has arrived as a AAA player. An 87% Steam rating says the audience is broadly satisfied. A 77 Metacritic says the execution didn’t match the ambition. All three numbers are true at once. Whether that adds up to a Game of the Year nomination — potentially the lowest-scored in The Game Awards’ history — depends on how forgiving the 2026 field turns out to be.

Sources